You may be left wondering if the author is really an expert on the topic he or she is writing about.Tags: Persuasive Speech Global Warming Is Real Not RealTomorrow When The War Began EssayCriteria Evaluate EssaysProblem Solving Clip ArtBuku Panduan Penulisan Tesis Gaya UkmRomeo And Juliet Act 3 Scene 1 Essay PlanEssay On Discipline In ClassEssay Animals CrueltyFull Essay On Global Warming
For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us using the feedback links in the box at the top right of each page in the authors & referees' website.
Questions about a specific manuscript should be directed to the editor who is handling the manuscript.
We may return to reviewers for further advice, particularly in cases where they disagree with each other, or where the authors believe they have been misunderstood on points of fact.
We therefore ask that reviewers should be willing to provide follow-up advice as requested.
Formal post-publication commentary on published papers can involve challenges, clarifications or, in some cases, replication of the published work and may, after peer review, be published online as Matters Arising, usually alongside a Reply from the original Nature journal authors.
Details of the submission criteria and peer review process for Matters Arising are provided in the Guide to Authors for each individual journal.Setting out the arguments for and against publication is often more helpful to the editors than a direct recommendation one way or the other.Editorial decisions are not a matter of counting votes or numerical rank assessments, and we do not always follow the majority recommendation.People of all ages and/or levels of knowledge could read these. The journal has very specific guidelines for papers to be published (often this information can be found on the journal’s website), and a rigorous peer-review process (each paper will list when it was submitted to the reviewers, and when it was accepted for publication…often several months apart! You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS.To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer).In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and Java Script.Other contributed articles are not usually peer-reviewed.Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors.Those papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from specialists in the field).Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three reviewers, but sometimes more if special advice is needed (for example on statistics or a particular technique).