Study Case Osha

Study Case Osha-49
Details of the MASTER project criteria are described in Exhibit 2.Some of the important program elements include training, on-site medical facilities, and drug testing.

Tags: College Application Writing ServiceArt Of Problem Solving AmcExplication Essay Richard CoryWrite English Essay OnlineCover Page Research Paper ApaMla Guidelines For EssaysPhd Thesis Types

By November 2000 with only minor finishing work remaining, the project had logged 3.35 million man-hours, with a job-lost time rate of 0.95 (national rate for construction industry: 4.0) and an OSHA recordable rate of 5.48 (national rate for construction industry: 10.4).

The project was completed with 92 OSHA recordable accidents, 16 involving lost time, no fatalities, and one fall injury.

The Cincinnati Area Office of OSHA developed a voluntary cooperative partnership with the contractors and Hamilton County to enhance overall job safety at the Paul Brown Stadium.

The partnership, known as Mobilized Alliance for Safety, Teamwork, Education and Results (MASTER) was designed to increase employee involvement, joint safety oversight by labor and management at job sites, teamwork between labor and management, and education of construction workers on construction sites.

In the Paul Brown Stadium, the county established an Owner Controlled Insurance Program, in which the county purchased third-party liability insurance for project contractors to cover workers' compensation and general liability.

Individual contractors purchased first-party insurance to cover only losses to equipment or property owned or being installed at the site.In addition to formulating an overall safety plan, the county's legal council, Frank Jones, was really encouraging Patrick to push all potential liability to the contractors.This would be very different than the way business was conducted on the Paul Brown Stadium.The safety program at Paul Brown Stadium was developed jointly by the Cincinnati Office of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the County of Hamilton, and the major contractors on the project, and included budget resources for training, drug testing, and on-site medical facilities among other things.With a sample size of two, Patrick was having a difficult time deciding if the safety initiative on the Paul Brown Stadium really made a difference or if one project had very good luck while the project at Miller Park simply had very bad luck.Was the safety program at fault or did they just have bad luck? The specific violations cited are listed in Exhibit 1.Following the crane collapse, OSHA investigated the job site and issued citations to three firms: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. The OSHA Area Director for Milwaukee believed that compliance with OSHA requirements would likely have prevented this tragedy.The crane known as "Big Blue" was lifting a section of the stadium roof weighing over 450 tons.Several environmental factors contributed to the accident including the wind and soft soil.An appeals court decision later reduced this award to million, but other appeals are expected that could raise this figure.(It is not expected that the figure could be lowered any more).


Comments Study Case Osha

The Latest from ©