Stanford Prison Experiment Essays

Nearly 50% of prisoners were released ahead of schedule due to extreme emotional disturbance (Zimbardo, 1999).Interestingly, personality did not predict/distinguish between levels of abusiveness among guards, as did situational characteristics (Dean, 2007; Zimbardo, 2007). As Phillip Zimbardo gave the guards their whistles and billy clubs they drastically changed without even realizing it.

Tags: Essay On A PlannedRag Paper For Counterfeit MoneyCritical Essays On Pride And PrejudiceAp Us History Essay QuestionRaisin In The Sun Essay PromptsStoichiometry HomeworkCatholic Views On Birth Control EssayAnimal Farm Essay On BoxerFitness Gym Business PlanShoeless Joe Jackson Essay

They were then blindfolded and taken to the mock prison in the basement of a Stanford Psychology building that had been decorated to look like a prison where guards fingerprinted, deloused, and gave prisoners a number which they would be calle... After only six days the Stanford Prison Experiment was stopped, after they originally planned it to last for two weeks.

This was not because Zimbardo thought it should be, of the guards out of line behavior, or because outsiders thought so.

To begin the experiment the Stanford Psychology department interviewed middle class, white males that were both physically and mentally healthy to pick 18 participants.

It was decided who would play guards and who would be prisoners by the flip of a coin making nine guards and nine prisoners.

Further, the study’s effect on participants caused ethical standards for research to change significantly.

Thus, this study remains highly relevant to the present day. (2007) “Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?

The guards were taken in first to be told of what they could and could not do to the prisoners.

The rules were guards weren’t allowed t o physically harm the prisoners and could only keep prisoners in “the hole” for a hour at a time.

This study highlights various issues that are still relevant to the present day. (2007) The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil, New York: Random House.

Results arguably demonstrated the obedience and malleability of people given legitimizing dogma and adequate institutional/collective support, cognitive dissonance theory and power of authority. (1999) “Reflections on the Stanford prison experiment: Genesis, transformation, consequences, in Blass, T. (1999) The Stanford prison experiment, [Online], Available: May 2012].