The second common set of literature review topics is authors and their works.
Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.
In the introduction, you should: Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature.
An important strategy for learning how to compose literature reviews in your field or within a specific genre is to locate and analyze representative examples.
The following collection of annotated sample literature reviews written and co-written by colleagues associated with UW-Madison showcases how these reviews can do different kind of work for different purposes.
Of course, you may pick just a single book, lots of them deserve an exclusive research.
Just keep in mind that it will be very hard to add something new to the already conducted researches of the classical pieces of literature. If you choose the not so well-known literature work instead, it will be great to illustrate your major points with the quotes from it, just to be at the same page with those who didn’t read it.
Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study.
Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession.
You are free to choose your favorite piece of literature and share your own emotions with the audience.
Still, despite this, a research paper needs some actual research.