Nationalism Vs Sectionalism Essay

They have a loose, though fairly definite, unification, in that all of them deal with the importance of sectionalism, but in the main these essays suggest fields that need both broad and intensive study; they do not furnish a complete history of any period or any section. Schlesinger’s “Rise of the City” is a closely knit and thoroughly documented historical narrative, and is Volume Ten of the comprehensive twelve-volume “History of American Life,” edited by Dixon Ryan Fox and Mr. But a wider view suggests that they are also excellently representative of two widely divergent schools of thought about American life.

They have a loose, though fairly definite, unification, in that all of them deal with the importance of sectionalism, but in the main these essays suggest fields that need both broad and intensive study; they do not furnish a complete history of any period or any section. Schlesinger’s “Rise of the City” is a closely knit and thoroughly documented historical narrative, and is Volume Ten of the comprehensive twelve-volume “History of American Life,” edited by Dixon Ryan Fox and Mr. But a wider view suggests that they are also excellently representative of two widely divergent schools of thought about American life.

Tags: Descriptive Essays With Thesis StatementsPersuasive Essay On MusicFact Monster Homework CenterAnalysis Poster EssayCollege Essays About Overcoming ChallengesResearch Methods For DissertationBusiness Plan Forecast

In an essay on “The West—18,” he treats this urbanization and industrial development in a specific section, but his treatment has greater moderation, and some element of doubt as to the eternal goodness embodied in this progress.

And the West remains a section, or a group of sections, that yet differ from other parts of the United States, and will for a long time resist any efforts toward complete standardization.

But it cannot be portrayed adequately when the basic and causal forces that brought about almost a social revolution are entirely neglected. Schlesinger writes with considerable understanding of the break-up of the old South into a new land of small farms and small industrial concerns, and with greater penetration of the conquest of the frontier West.

Once this limitation is recognized, the book becomes immensely valuable. But he is most at home when he describes the appeal of the city, and the physical and scientific advances that it produced.

No chapter is more fascinating or more thorough than his description of woman’s part in this urban development.

And he gives equally thorough attention to education, literature (as seen historically), religion, and all the habits, pleasures, and problems that were involved in this changing world.Schlesinger sticks perhaps too closely to the narrow span of years that he treats; the apparent homogeneity has, somehow, never occurred, and the cities have in many cases become only another one of the sections that Mr. Unfortunately, Professor Schlesinger does not consider the economic aspects of the years 1878-1898. But one doubts if the true significance of the rise of the city can be discussed in any other terms. Undoubtedly, the new domination of city over country represented the triumph of organized man in a collectivistic state over individual man in a democratic state; but that triumph, essentially, was an economic one.After 1865, the country changed, first slowly but by 1878 with an ever-increasing rapidity, from an agrarian and localized economy to an in-dustrialistic and highly centralized economy.After the war of 1812, from 1815 to 1825, some Historians claimed that the nation embraced an Era of Good Feelings due to the destruction of the Federalist Party (but not its ideas) and the numerous nationalistic improvements. Undoubtedly, the compromise damaged the nationalistic feelings of the nation and created sectionalism since the North and the South refused to give up political power that would put their region’s interests at stake. As run by William Jones who issued more banknotes than there were species and allowed employees to steal from the bank.However, a better name for the post war years of 1815 to 1825 is an Era Of Mixed Feelings because although there Were improvements stimulated by nationalism, there were also conflicts created by sectionalism. Acquired Florida from Spain for million, which basically secured U. Economically, the nation’s wealth did increase but the issue Of protective tariffs brought disunion because the North supported it while the South opposed it. When Jones was replaced by Speeches, Speeches stopped issuing bank notes so he could stop the distressing inflation.After the war of 1 812, the people of the United States felt enormous pride in winning a war against the almighty Britain and used their nationalism to inspire improvements. Many people of the South shared John Randolph view that it was “unjust, to aggravate the burdens of the people for the purpose of favoring the manufactures. A) Furthermore, the Panic of 1 819, which was chiefly the fault of the 2nd Bank of the United States, hindered the nation’s growth. This course of action damaged businesses and farms throughout the county thus people could not pay their loans.Beginning with James Monomer’s election in 1816, Monroe (Republican) won the election with an outstanding ratio of 1 83 electoral votes to his opponent Rufus Kings (Federalist) 34 votes. As a result banks foreclosed people’s properties but even then, banks could not sell the mortgages. Dilemma caused many conflicts for the Lignite States.The nation celebrated its culture and virtues, adopted Henry Clays American System, was united politically until the years prior to the election of 1 824, and dad auspicious declarations with European powers.At first glance, these two volumes seem to have little relation to each other.Frederick Jackson Turner’s “Significance of Sections” is a posthumous collection of essays, arranged by Max Farrand. In plan and in content, these two books seem far apart.