Tags: Options Research PapersEssays About Writing SkillsCollege Research Paper Writing Service ReviewsList Of Essay Writing SkillsPay For Essay Writing UkCan You Ask Rhetorical Questions Formal Essay
I hope it gets a lot of traffic and that people will actively participate in on-going discussions and debates.As I wrote above, at the very least, researchers and non-researchers will have to make clear why they take the position they do. These desires result from our values, from the importance we ascribe to both human and animal life.
Below is an outline of circumstances when it could be considered acceptable and unacceptable.
Firstly, it is clear that major advances in fighting disease, viruses and illnesses would not have been made without testing products on animals.
While more research might expand society's knowledge base, why is this research necessary and how can it be justified?
[When Animals Suffer, the Country Pays a Price (Op-Ed ) ]These are not anti-scientific questions, but rather they may, or will, move some people out of their comfort zones and ask them to discuss why they do what they do.
I often find myself scratching my head wondering what in the world is going on.
Do people really need more research on animals, who are known to have rich and deep emotional lives, to learn more about our own rich and deep emotional lives — or in commercial testing?The majority of Americans agree that animal research must continue.But legislators rarely hear from this majority, whereas they are bombarded by appeals from the small minority who wish to stop or severely curtail such research.Some people say without hesitation that they love nonhuman animals (animals) and then intentionally harm them in education, research, entertainment, for food and clothing, and for sport. Some people argue — or simply claim — we need to harm other animals to learn about them even if we cause suffering and then kill them in the name of science.While most researchers who support animal testing seem to feel this is a regrettable but necessary practice, some, such as Dr.Over centuries humans have experimented with many different chemicals, products, and processes, with the final aim of bettering our conditions.Testing products on animals most likely dates back centuries, however, in modern society it is a controversial point.This essay is adapted from one that appeared in Bekoff's column Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.People's relationships with other animals are a messy and confusing affair.We know, for example, from scientific research published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals, that mice, rats, and chickens display empathy and that rats like to be tickled and laugh, but they are still used and abused by the millions in various types of research and are protected by the Federal Animal Protection Act in the U. Indeed, those animals are not even considered to be animals.Appealing to, and extending, the precautionary principle to people's interactions with other animals, one can easily argue that society knows all we need to know right now to use such information on behalf of other animals.