STRUCTURE The staging of the discussion is not always straightforward and the order in which you sequence the information depends on the aim of the experiment and the kind of results you obtained.
STRUCTURE The staging of the discussion is not always straightforward and the order in which you sequence the information depends on the aim of the experiment and the kind of results you obtained.Tags: Melbourne University Creative WritingMarine Bio Research PaperBuy HomeworkWriting An Introduction For A Research Paper Apa StyleDissertation In PsychologyCreative Writing Exercises Ks2Limitations Section Of A Research PaperCalm Things Essays
One guideline for staging the discussion is shown here based on extracts from the discussion in one of the cholesterol reports.
Although this is a good guideline, remember it is only a guideline and you need to adapt it to each experiment you carry out.
If you left few interesting leads and open questions in the results section, the discussion is simply a matter of building upon those and expanding them.
In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
Similarly, over the same period, consumption of a low cholesterol diet did not significantly reduce plasma cholesterol concentration.
This result should be interpreted with caution because each of the 3 subjects used in the analysis for the high-cholesterol group finished the study with an identical plasma cholesterol concentration of 8 m M (probably coincidentally).The discussion section is not always about what you found, but what you did not find, and how you deal with that.Stating that the results are inconclusive is the easy way out, and you must always try to pick out something of value.Consumption of a high cholesterol diet did not significantly increase blood cholesterol concentration over a 12-week period (Figure 1) Similarly, over the same period, consumption of a low cholesterol diet did not significantly reduce plasma cholesterol concentration.However after 12 weeks the plasma cholesterol concentration of the high-cholesterol diet group was 50% greater than that of the low-cholesterol group (PThe greatest problem with this study, however, was compliance.If not, suggest any modifications and improvements that could be made to the design.Maybe the reason that you did not find a significant correlation is because your sampling was not random, or you did not use sensitive enough equipment.Whilst your results may not be enough to reject the null hypothesis, they may show a trend that later researchers may wish to explore, perhaps by refining the experiment.For this purpose, you should criticize the experiment, and be honest about whether your design was good enough.In a future study, it is recommended that more subjects of both sexes be chosen; that meals of known cholesterol content are prepared for the subjects ...........In a future study, it is recommended that more subjects of both sexes be chosen; that meals of known cholesterol content are prepared for the subjects and that their compliance with the dietary regime be monitored effectively; and that each subject acts as their own control by consuming both diets in a randomised, cross-over sequence.