Deconstruction only points to the necessity of an unending analysis that can make explicit the decisions and arbitrary violence intrinsic to all texts.Finally, Derrida argues that it is not enough to expose and deconstruct the way oppositions work and then stop there in a nihilistic or cynical position, "thereby preventing any means of intervening in the field effectively".
Deconstruction only points to the necessity of an unending analysis that can make explicit the decisions and arbitrary violence intrinsic to all texts.Finally, Derrida argues that it is not enough to expose and deconstruct the way oppositions work and then stop there in a nihilistic or cynical position, "thereby preventing any means of intervening in the field effectively".The first task of deconstruction would be to find and overturn these oppositions inside a text or a corpus of texts.Tags: Essay About Hair SalonOnline Case Studies NursingFfrf High School Senior Essay CompetitionBusiness Plan CoverInternational Dissertation Field Research STutankhamun And Other EssaysResearch Paper Cover LetterI Need Help With My Persuasive Essay
His Platonic reflections are inseparably part of his critique of modernity, hence the attempt to be something beyond the modern, because of this Nietzschian sense that the modern has lost its way and become mired in nihilism.
Différance is the observation that the meanings of words come from their synchrony with other words within the language and their diachrony between contemporary and historical definitions of a word.
which is often mistranslated as "there is nothing outside of the text".
The mistranslation is often used to suggest Derrida believes that nothing exists but words.
Understanding language according to Derrida required an understanding of both viewpoints of linguistic analysis.
The focus on diachrony has led to accusations against Derrida of engaging in the Etymological fallacy.The same can be said about verbs, in all the languages in the world: when should we stop saying "walk" and start saying "run"?The same happens, of course, with adjectives: when must we stop saying "yellow" and start saying "orange", or exchange "past" for "present?Derrida called undecidables, that is, unities of simulacrum, "false" verbal properties (nominal or semantic) that can no longer be included within philosophical (binary) opposition: but which, however, inhabit philosophical oppositions, resisting and organizing it, without ever constituting a third term, without ever leaving room for a solution in the form of Hegelian dialectics (e.g.différance, archi-writing, pharmakon, supplement, hymen, gram, spacing). In the continental philosophy tradition, debates surrounding ontology, epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, hermeneutics, and philosophy of language still refer to it today.To Derrida's claim about the impossibility of a non-metaphysical concept of time we reply (a) he elsewhere endorses a 'pluri-dimensional' temporality, and (b) when being careful, he admits that it is not concepts per se that are metaphysical, but their mode of textual articulation.From these two concessions our double strategy develops. His denial of an original, primitive time, coupled with his understanding of metaphysics in terms of textual articulation licences a programme for the description of temporal structures and representations of time, one abjuring any foundationalist pretensions, and resisting the temptation to spatializing interpretations. We redescribe the 'moment' in a way that breaks utterly with any representational element whatever.Like Nietzsche, Derrida suspects Plato of dissimulation in the service of a political project, namely the education, through critical reflections, of a class of citizens more strategically positioned to influence the polis.However, like Nietzsche, Derrida is not satisfied merely with such a political interpretation of Plato, because of the particular dilemma modern humans find themselves stuck in.Michel Foucault, for instance, famously misattributed to Derrida the very different phrase "Il n'y a rien en dehors du text" for this purpose.For example, the word "house" derives its meaning more as a function of how it differs from "shed", "mansion", "hotel", "building", etc.