From Ancient Greece, Ching dynasty China, Victorian England to the American South, the trick has been to convince women that conforming to patriarchal ideals, being chaste, or modest, veiling one’s face, whatever, are in her interests in terms of her security, marriageability, and especially in the interest of her children, particularly sons.Tags: Business Plan Presentation TipsHollins Mfa Creative WritingArgumentative Essay Against Gay MarriageThesis Amenabar ReviewIntrusion Detection System Research PaperEssay On Visit To Taj Mahal AgraOf A Reference Page For A Research PaperHow Long Are ThesisBusiness Law Paper Outline
The states in the process of restricting abortion are either seeking to prohibit it after a set number of weeks, ranging from six to 20 depending on the state; or to prohibit abortion after a heartbeat can be detected (roughly six weeks); or, in the case of Alabama, to ban all abortions except those to save the life of the mother.
The abortion debate is a key element in the larger division of opinion in America about the sexual revolution, pitting those who believe that sexual autonomy is crucial to the achievement of gender equality against those who, in the words of the Southern Baptist Convention,honor the rich and valuable contributions of full-time wives and mothers who through their service and self-sacrifice have strengthened their families, enriched our nation and pleased our God by honoring his purposes in their lives each day.
But of course that only works if they are his children.
Evolutionarily speaking, cuckoldry is the worst thing that can happen to a man, because his investment would be wasted in protecting another man’s to control the sexuality, and more generally, the reproductive capacity, of their wives and girlfriends (and for that matter their unmarried daughters, preserving their value in the arranged marriage market).
President Trump’s appointment of two conservative justices to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, opened the anti-abortion floodgates this year.
Republican legislatures in eight states — Alabama, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Georgia, Arkansas, Kentucky and Utah — have enacted stringent anti-abortion legislation, gambling that the five-member conservative bloc on the court will weaken or overturn Roe — or, if that strategy fails, that anti-abortion supporters will be galvanized for the 2020 election.Those who oppose abortion usually begin by stipulating that since the embryo is an unborn child, abortion is morally equivalent to murder.But for those who accept abortion, this initial stipulation is exactly what is problematic; from their point of view, the embryo has the capacity to become a child but it is not a child yet, and therefore belongs to a very different moral category.For example, on the abortion rights side, last year Gallup found that a clear majority — 64-28 — opposed overturning Roe v Wade.By 60-34, the public believed abortion should be legal during the first three months of pregnancy.Leaders of the anti-abortion movement are explicit in placing blame on the sexual revolution for what they see as the larger corruption of the social order, the demand for women’s autonomy and for abortion.“The abortion license has helped to erode the moral foundations of the American civic community,” wrote 39 prominent opponents of abortion in a famous 1996 declaration, “The America We Seek: A Statement of Pro-Life Principle and Concern.”How do its opponents believe abortion has undermined the American moral character?According to the statement, The abortion license is inextricably bound up with the mores of the sexual revolution.Put another way, “ideology is just the narrative used to sell the strategy that is in one’s interests.”Sarah B.Hrdy, professor emerita of anthropology at the University of California, Davis, and the author of “Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species,” wrote in reply to my inquiry that the issues touched on in the abortion debate run deep: Nature provides myriad examples of species where males attempt to control who females mate with and when.From 1975 to 1988, the views of Democrats and Republicans on abortion were virtually identical, again according to Gallup, when 18 percent to 21 percent of voters in both parties agreed that abortions should be allowed “under any circumstances.” Since 1988, the parties have diverged: by 2018, 46 percent of Democrats, but only 11 percent of Republicans, said abortion should be “available under any circumstances.”Contemporary polling shows that there are a number of contradictions in the public view of abortion.In some respects, majority opinion is supportive of abortion rights, in others it is opposed.